Pieros Δημοσιεύτηκε Φεβρουάριος 28, 2004 #1 Κοινοποίηση Δημοσιεύτηκε Φεβρουάριος 28, 2004 Παρακάτω μια φωτό απο 2 χ 512 ΒΗ-5! Στο memtest dos 1.11 βγάζει λάθη απο το 3ο τεστ! Εδώ μέσω win μας λέει άλλα! Ποιο να πιστέψω? Εννοείται πως δουλεύει 1000 λούπες sandra κ πολλές 3dmark 2001 nature Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soki Φεβρουάριος 28, 2004 #2 Κοινοποίηση Φεβρουάριος 28, 2004 Μπορει να θελουν cas to ras 3 εκει οι μνημες ή να θελει vcore ο επεξεργαστης, σε τι Mhz εισαι? εισαι σταθερος εκει? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pieros Φεβρουάριος 28, 2004 Author #3 Κοινοποίηση Φεβρουάριος 28, 2004 Ο cpu ειναι χαλαρος στα 3634. Απλά δεν ξέρω τι να πιστέψω!Μήπως θέλει το Μ/Β vdd?Exω ΜΑΧ2 ΙCG-7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soki Φεβρουάριος 28, 2004 #4 Κοινοποίηση Φεβρουάριος 28, 2004 Για δοκιμασε τις μνημες μια μια, και σε διαφορετικο duall channel. Μπορει η μια να μην αντεχει. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pieros Φεβρουάριος 28, 2004 Author #5 Κοινοποίηση Φεβρουάριος 28, 2004 Τελικά φταιει το VTT κ μαλλον μοβτ το psu! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shidokanjohn Φεβρουάριος 28, 2004 #6 Κοινοποίηση Φεβρουάριος 28, 2004 Τι εννοεις φταει το VTt?Εχεις κανει Vmem? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pieros Φεβρουάριος 28, 2004 Author #7 Κοινοποίηση Φεβρουάριος 28, 2004 Ναι έχω κάνει αλλά καθαρά σηκώνει μέχρι 3.15 περίπου! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enduracell Φεβρουάριος 28, 2004 #8 Κοινοποίηση Φεβρουάριος 28, 2004 Δε ξέρω αν είναι χρήσιμο αλλά ορίστε μερικά σχόλια για κάθε test.Well since it has been brought up so many times i thought i'd post a reply I did to a post at asusboards.com about my thoughts on memtest86 and how i test Generalmemtest ain't 100% but you can use memtest to guage the max possible FSB/MEM which is the top limit of what you can expect... since i don't think i've ever experienced windows 100% stability and error free at a speed higher than the highest memtest passable speedthereforemax FSB/MEM speed (100% windows error free/stability) <= max FSB/MEM speed (memtest error free)My experiences and testing methodstest #1 - 4 are cpu fsb speed and or vcore related (meaning lowering fsb or increasing vcore saw errors in these tests disappear)test #5 prior to 865/875 boards - memory speed, timings and vdimm related (meaning altering mem speed, timings and/or vdimm saw errors in this test disappear)test#6with 865/875 boards bigtoe has said related to cycle time (tras) in cpuz which i sort of confirmed with my current testingnote: prior to 865/875 boards, i've never had memory errors in test #6 only since these new boards have i experienced test #6 errorstest #7 not sure very rarely have i experienced errorsextended testtest #8 is a more intensive version of test #5most memory related errors pop up at test #5 hence i like looping test #5 for memory testing for 12-24hrs after 1-4hr general standard loop of test #1-7i like to loop test #3 and/or #4 for cpu related issuesI follow it up with at least goldmem 5.07:2 quick test loops+2-4 full standard loops <-- can take forever trying doing it with 4 x 512mb xms3200c2 this is done, before i even load windows... if theres errors in above stage memtest or goldmem stages, i don't even bother loading windows or benching i realise not everyone has time to do this but i like to know exactly what i get (ram) and how it performs some people just load windows and see if it crashes or is stable... but you can't see why it crashes or isn't stable - is it the memory or cpu related etc it makes it easier to test when you have more than 1 pc and a kvm switch to control 2-4 pcs from the same consoleupdate: Aug 10, 2003Interesting while reading up on memtest86 I found something i didn't catch before, the description of test #4 http://memtest86.com/#detailsquote: ________________________________________Test 4 [Moving inv, 32 bit pat, cached] This is a variation of the moving inversions algorithm that shifts the data pattern left one bit for each successive address. The starting bit position is shifted left for each pass. To use all possible data patterns 32 passes are required. This test is effective in detecting data sensitive errors in "wide" memory chips. ________________________________________so if you're running standard test #1-7 the bare minimum passes you're want to run would be = 32 passes to test all data patternsFor 256MB stick to do 32 standard test passess of test #1-7 would take between 75-160 minutes - longer for more memoryΔυστυχώς δε θυμάμαι που το είχα βρει. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shidokanjohn Φεβρουάριος 28, 2004 #9 Κοινοποίηση Φεβρουάριος 28, 2004 Αρχική απάντηση από Pieros Ναι έχω κάνει αλλά καθαρά σηκώνει μέχρι 3.15 περίπου! δεν σηκωνει 3.15,,,αν δεν κανεις και το vtt απλα δεν.,,, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.