pokemon6401442169101 Δημοσιεύτηκε Απρίλιος 7, 2006 #1 Κοινοποίηση Δημοσιεύτηκε Απρίλιος 7, 2006 θα ήθελα ένα πρόγραμμα για ανασυγκρότηση δίσκων.. παλιότερα είχα το perfect disk αλλά κάποια στιγμή μετακύνησε αρχεία συστήματος και μετά απο ένα restart δεν ξεκινάγαν τα windows(win2000 Advanced Server)! Θέλω ένα που να δουλέυει κανονικά χωρίς προβλήματα και τρελές απαιτήσεις ..Υ.Γ. Για αρχή ψάχνω έκδοση συμβατή με Windows NT 4 - SP 6a παράλληλα ψάχνω και για server 2003..Υ.Γ.2. Sorry αν έκανα λάθη αλλά δεν εγκατέστησα το ακόμα Word:106:Και τέλος.. Μέχρι ποιό Direct X δέχονται τα ΝΤ4? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
varelasj Απρίλιος 7, 2006 #2 Κοινοποίηση Απρίλιος 7, 2006 Δοκιμασε το diskeeper μηπως σου κανει. Αρκετα γρηγορο και κανει δουλεια. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evolution_R Απρίλιος 7, 2006 #3 Κοινοποίηση Απρίλιος 7, 2006 To diskeeper και απο μενα το 10 εχει αρκετες βελτιωσεις και ειναι πολυ πιο γρηγορο.Tα Windows NT4 αν δεν κανω λαθος υποστηριζουν μεχρι και το 7.0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evolution_R Απρίλιος 7, 2006 #4 Κοινοποίηση Απρίλιος 7, 2006 :edited: Δευτερη φορα σημερα double post :076: :076: :076: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ang3l Απρίλιος 7, 2006 #5 Κοινοποίηση Απρίλιος 7, 2006 το O&O Defrag κάνει δουλειά με τα λειτουργικά που ζητάει ο φίλος pokemon640? είμαι πολύ ευχαριστημένος μεταξύ πολλών που δοκίμασα! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KTM Απρίλιος 7, 2006 #6 Κοινοποίηση Απρίλιος 7, 2006 Ο&Ο Defrag Pro, is the best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gfa3 Απρίλιος 8, 2006 #7 Κοινοποίηση Απρίλιος 8, 2006 Το προτεινω επισης. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
regent1442169115 Απρίλιος 8, 2006 #8 Κοινοποίηση Απρίλιος 8, 2006 [OT]Πώς επηρεάζουν (προς το καλύτερο θεωρώ) τα προγράμματα αυτά τη διαδικασία της ανασυγκρότησης;[/OT] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mefistofelis Απρίλιος 8, 2006 #9 Κοινοποίηση Απρίλιος 8, 2006 Eγω με το diskkeeper ειμαι απολυτα ευχαριστημενος και ειναι και πολυ γρηγορο Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NGF Απρίλιος 8, 2006 #10 Κοινοποίηση Απρίλιος 8, 2006 Δεν υπαρχει κινδυνος να μην ξαναξεκινησουν τα windows..... ή απωλειας αρχειων-ανακατεμα κτλ?Γιατι αν ειναι να ψαχνομαι τοτε παραμενω σε windows defragment toolΑπο εχτες στις 9 ο υπολογιστης ειναι ανοιχτος και τον εφτιαχνα-διαλυθηκαν ολα, μην ξαναψαχνομαι! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KTM Απρίλιος 8, 2006 #11 Κοινοποίηση Απρίλιος 8, 2006 [OT]Πώς επηρεάζουν (προς το καλύτερο θεωρώ) τα προγράμματα αυτά τη διαδικασία της ανασυγκρότησης;[/OT]Τα παρακατω ειναι απο το Help του O&O Defrag V8 Pro.Ειναι οι διαφορες επιλογες ανασυγκροτησης που σου δινει την δυνατοτηατα να κανεις, αναλογα με τις αναγκες του υπολογιστη σου.STEALTH MethodThe STEALTH method differs from the other methods in that it is much faster and uses much less central memory for the defragmentation.The STEALTH method has been designed with large fileservers in mind. It can, however, be used to great effect on workstations and other AlgorithmThe STEALTH method is based on our unique STEALTH technology, allowing an unprecedented level of defragmentation on computers with a large number of files, little free space or available central memory. This method defragments all fragmented files and tries to consolidate them in order to optimize available free space. Here, speed and resource usage are the main considerations and the method is therefore not quite as thorough as the SPACE and COMPLETE methods. Recommended usageThe STEALTH method is particularly recommended for the following systems. STEALTH can also be used for regular defragmentation runs. •Initial defragmentation of your system•Computers with few available resources, as the method does not greatly increase the CPU usage and does not require much free hard disk space. •Servers with very large hard disks (e.g. more than 1 terabyte) •Computers with a very large number of files (more than 250,000 files) ------------------------------------------------------------------------SPACE MethodThe SPACE methods offer you a great solution if your volumes are very heavily fragmented. It also allows you to consolidate your data so that the amount of contiguous free space is as large as possible and further fragmentation is prevented. The SPACE method is the best one for your initial defragmentation and for defragmentation in the background, as long as there is enough free space on the hard disk and the number of files is not too great. Otherwise, you should consider using the STEALTH method. AlgorithmAll fragmented files will be defragmented, and then placed into the free slots in which they fit. This maximizes contiguous free space. This method is very quick and efficient and it does reorganize your volume, but not as thoroughly as the COMPLETE methods. Further defragmentation will not be affected by the SPACE method. The SPACE method is ideal for the first defragmentation run on a system that has never been defragmented, as it requires far less free space than the COMPLETE methods. Recommended UsageThe SPACE method is particularly recommended for the following systems. SPACE can also be used for regular defragmentation runs. •For the initial defragmentation of your system. •Computers with few available resources, as the method does not greatly increase the CPU usage and does not require much free hard disk space. •Servers with large hard disks (e.g. more than 100 gigabytes) •Computers with a large number of files (more than 100,000 files) -------------------------------------------------------------------------COMPLETE/Access MethodThe COMPLETE/Access method defragments your files and reorganizes your file structure. Although this method is slower than the STEALTH and SPACE methods, it guarantees maximum system performance when your files are being read. The COMPLETE/Access method is suitable for servers and workstations. Please bear in mind that this method uses a lot of central memory due to the reorganization of your system. If this is likely to be a serious problem for your system, we recommend you use the STEALTH or SPACE methods. AlgorithmFiles are sorted according to when they were last accessed. The files that have been accessed the least will be placed at the beginning of the partition, and those that are accessed that most frequently are put near the end. Seldom-used files are defragmented and will not need to be moved in future. Frequently-used files are placed at the end of the volumes. This strategy means that future defragmentation runs are as quick as possible, as fewer files need to be checked and defragmented. Recommended UsageThe COMPLETE/Access method is particularly suitable for use on the following systems. Please bear in mind that using the COMPLETE/Access method for regular defragmentation runs should not be mixed with other methods. This would lead to longer defragmentation times, as the file system has to be reorganized again. •Maximizes the read access performance on servers. •For regularly defragmenting your volumes •On computers that have sufficient resources available when the defragmentation takes place – CPU usage is likely to increase significantly (it is strongly recommended that you use the O&O ActivityGuard). A larger amount of free disk space is necessary with this method. •All kinds of servers and workstations-------------------------------------------------------------------------COMPLETE/Modified MethodThe COMPLETE/Modified method defragments your files and also reorganized your file structure. Although this method is slower that the STEALTH or SPACE methods, it guarantees maximum performance in the reading of your files. The COMPLETE method is particularly suitable for databases and fileservers. It is important to bear in mind that this method requires quite a lot of central memory due to the file reorganization. If this is a serious problem for your system, we recommend you use the STEALTH or SPACE methods. AlgorithmFiles are sorted according to the date on which they were last changed. The files which have not been changed recently are placed at the beginning of the partition, and the files that have been changed recently are placed at the end. This option is a good one for file or database servers which contain files that have never been changed (e.g. system files), but where others are frequently modified. (e.g. database files) This strategy means that future defragmentation runs will be much quicker, as only a few files need to be checked and defragmented. Recommended UsageThe COMPLETE/Modified method is particularly suitable for use on the following systems. If you want to use the COMPLETE/Modified method for your regular defragmentation runs, you should bear in mind that you only use this method and do not mix it with any other. This means that future defragmentation runs are slower, as the file system would need to be reorganized. •Maximizes the performance for write access on servers. •Use for regular defragmentation runs •Use on computers that have sufficient free resources at the time when you wish to defragment, as CPU usage will increase specifically and a lot of free space is required – using the O&O ActivityGuard is particularly recommended. •Suitable for all types of servers and workstations. ------------------------------------------------------------------------COMPLETE/Name MethodThe COMPLETE/Name method defragments your files and also reorganizes your file structure. Although this method is slower than the STEALTH and SPACE methods, it guarantees maximum performance for the read access to your system. The COMPLETE/Name method is particularly suitable for system volumes. Please bear in mind that this method needs a lot of central memory due to the reorganization process. If this is a serious problem for your system, we recommend you use the STEALTH or SPACE methodsAlgorithmFiles are sorted alphabetically from the beginning to the end of the partition. This leads to quick access to files in a directory. When Windows starts up, many system files will be read in sequence from the \WINDOWS and the \WINDOWS\system32 directories (DLLs, system drives, etc.) and the start-up time will therefore be shorter. This method is particularly recommended for computers on which the files rarely change. This reduces the reorganization time that is needed for every defragmentation. Recommended UsageThe COMPLETE/Name method is particularly suitable for use on the following systems. Please bear in mind that if you use the COMPLETE/Name method for your regular defragmentation runs, you should not mix it with other methods. If you do this, the defragmentation will take longer, as the files will have to be rearranged once more.•Maximizes the performance for the read access to workstations •For regular defragmentation of a volume •For computers which have sufficient available resources at the time when you wish to defragment, as CPU usage will increase and a lot of free hard disk space is required (use of the O&O ActivityGuard is particularly recommended). •All types of servers and workstations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manolis1442169134 Μάϊος 14, 2008 #12 Κοινοποίηση Μάϊος 14, 2008 Έβαλα το Ο&Ο server. Για την καλύτερη ανασυγκρότηση ως προς την ταχύτητα προτείνετε βάση του access ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Candyman1442169163 Μάϊος 14, 2008 #13 Κοινοποίηση Μάϊος 14, 2008 Εγώ προτείνω το Perfect Disk 2008. Mε το τελευταίο update παίζει άψογα.Αλλιώς αν δεν το θές με τίποτα.. ότι λένε και οι άλλοι: Diskeeper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apotsi Μάϊος 14, 2008 #14 Κοινοποίηση Μάϊος 14, 2008 +1 κι από εμένα για το Perfect Disk 2008.Φοβερό πρόγραμμα. Και το Stealth Patrol.... όλα τα λεφτά. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duncan11442169203 Μάϊος 14, 2008 #15 Κοινοποίηση Μάϊος 14, 2008 +1, για Diskeeper,έγω αυτό χρησιμοποιώ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manolis1442169134 Μάϊος 14, 2008 #16 Κοινοποίηση Μάϊος 14, 2008 Ωραια παιδια ευχαριστώ για τις προτάσεις σας αλλα το ερώτημα μου δεν ήταν ποιο να διαλέξω. ΑΠλά ρώτησα:Για την καλύτερη ανασυγκρότηση ως προς την ταχύτητα προτείνετε βάση του access ή π.χ κάποια απο τις άλλες επιλογές του; Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Candyman1442169163 Μάϊος 14, 2008 #17 Κοινοποίηση Μάϊος 14, 2008 Μανώλη ρίξε μια ματιά στο link: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/288631Και αν δεν βαριέσαι ρίξε μια γρήγορη ματιά στο παρακάτω:http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_pwwi/is_200803/ai_n24933043 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manolis1442169134 Μάϊος 14, 2008 #18 Κοινοποίηση Μάϊος 14, 2008 Ωραία links ! Να σαι καλα Candyman.Υ.Γ: Αμα χτυπήσω ενα h/w raid controller δεν ξαναβάζω win μέχρι να αλλαξουν file system. Καταραμένο ntfs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Candyman1442169163 Μάϊος 14, 2008 #19 Κοινοποίηση Μάϊος 14, 2008 Ωραία links ! Να σαι καλα Candyman. Πάντοτε στην διάθεση σου man! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dominator1442169151 Μάϊος 16, 2008 #20 Κοινοποίηση Μάϊος 16, 2008 Εγώ προτείνω το Perfect Disk 2008. Mε το τελευταίο update παίζει άψογα.Αλλιώς αν δεν το θές με τίποτα.. ότι λένε και οι άλλοι: Diskeeper.Δύο φορές που το δοκίμασα (trial) μου έκανε κατά τν ανάλυση επενεκκίνηση , μετά απο μια σύντομη BOD.:074: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.