Jump to content

Recommended Posts

WPrime 1024M Ranking

----------------------------------------------------

WPrime is a quick and easy way to measure your processor performance

download here

Rules

- don't use multiple nicknames

- only post scores belonging to you

- 1024M calculation only

- use the online submission function of wprime

Guidelines

- format your score as follows: [hwbot] score - system description [/hwbot]

- try not to use abbreviations. eg. 'opteron 146' is ok, '146' is too short.

- format processor overclock like 'A64 3200+ @ 2850Mhz' or 'A64 3200+ @ 2.85Ghz', format videocard speed as 'R9800 @ 350/333Mhz'.

- allowed score formats: '120.34' or '120.34s' or '120.34sec' or '1m 120.233s' or '1h 1m 120.233s'

- don't use text layout (bold, italic) or hyperlinks in your system description.

bot info

moderators: GoriLLakoS, pclab, RootX, darkCount, Stelaras, TASOS, deadlock7, mortisboy, hipro5, Costas

members who changed team:

options: update ranking now

team ranking - hall of fame

rank - top 10 average - team name - weekly & monthly rankchange - links

1. 195.29 XtremeSystems - ~ ~ - website - forum

2. 209.22 Bench Tec UK - ~ ~ - website - forum

3. 209.27 JMax-Hardware - ~ ~ - website - forum

4. 216.11 H.O.T. (Hellas O/C Team) - ~ ~ - website - forum

5. 221.98 i4memory.com - ~ ~ - website - forum

...

member ranking - hall of fame - more

  • 1. k|ngp|n (XtremeSystems) - 112.25 - SKULLTRAIL QX9775 Dragon F1 eXtreme LN2 cooled | overclocKingpin.com
    2. Chosen (H.O.T. (Hellas O/C Team)) - 112.59 - Dell Poweredge R900, 4x Intel Xeon X7350 @ 2926MHz, 28x2Gb DDR2 ECC FB-DIMMs - was 32x2Gb but one of the DIMMs failed and we had to remove 4 :(, Onboard ATI card (rack server, duh!), Windows 2008 Datacenter, , Production server, impossible to get Wprime t
    3. PowerToTheUsers ([M]adshrimps.BE OC-Team) - 112.67 - Powered by an IBM x3850M2
    ...
    1. Chosen - 1min 52sec 590ms - Xeon [email protected] - Dell Poweredge R900, 4x Intel Xeon X7350 @ 2926MHz, 28x2Gb DDR2 ECC FB-DIMMs - was 32x2Gb but one of the DIMMs failed and we had to remove 4 :(, Onboard ATI card (rack server, duh!), Windows 2008 Datacenter, , Production server, impossible to get Wprime t
    2. tsan - 3min 32sec 580ms - Core 2 QX9770 (3.2Ghz)@56352mhz -
    3. mickeymouse - 3min 36sec 890ms - Core 2 QX9650 (3.00Ghz)@5614mhz - no description
    4. GoriLLakoS - 3min 37sec 480ms - Xeon [email protected] - Simple Test on Air, Everything default
    5. hipro5 - 3min 37sec 490ms - Core 2 QX9650 (3.00Ghz)@5602mhz - no description
    6. gprhellas - 3min 38sec 300ms - Core 2 QX9650 (3.00Ghz)@5601mhz - no description
    7. Aristidis - 3min 40sec 990ms - Core 2 QX9770 (3.2Ghz)@5491mhz - no description
    8. zafiropo - 4min 0sec 810ms - processor unknown - INTEL XEON X5365
    9. mortisboy - 4min 11sec 0ms - Core 2 QX9650 (3.00Ghz)@5354mhz -
    10. giorgos th. - 4min 13sec 0ms - Core 2 QX9650 (3.00Ghz)@5507mhz - no description
    11. elefsinaras - 4min 15sec 310ms - Core 2 QX9650 (3.00Ghz)@5536mhz - anonymous submission with wPrime on 19 Dec 2007 12:34 AM
    12. Stelaras - 4min 24sec 850ms - Core 2 Q6700 (2.66Ghz)@4900.50mhz - Intel [email protected]
    13. NIKOSE - 4min 35sec 280ms - Core 2 QX9650 (3.00Ghz)@4532mhz - no description
    14. petr00kos - 4min 41sec 420ms - Core 2 QX9650 (3.00Ghz)@4050mhz - no description
    15. zavlakas - 5min 46sec 590ms - Core 2 Q6700 (2.66Ghz)@3848mhz -
    16. LevelOne - 5min 52sec 200ms - Core 2 Q6600 (2.4Ghz)@3598mhz -
    17. Daidalos - 5min 56sec 920ms - Core 2 Q6600 (2.4Ghz)@3680mhz -
    18. TASOS - 5min 59sec 380ms - Core 2 QX6700 (2.66Ghz)@3734mhz - no description
    19. Thodoris21 - 5min 59sec 610ms - Core 2 Q6600 (2.4Ghz)@3807mhz - no description
    20. panoc - 6min 7sec 890ms - Core 2 Q6600 (2.4Ghz)@3824mhz - [email protected] - abit ip35pro
    21. Thorlite - 6min 8sec 160ms - Core 2 QX6700 (2.66Ghz)@3597.20mhz - Quad 3,6
    22. cyclone - 6min 13sec 560ms - Core 2 QX6700 (2.66Ghz)@3574mhz - [email protected] MHz, 1.5 V on i975XBX2KR
    23. Robertox25 - 6min 15sec 880ms - Core 2 Q9300 (2.5Ghz)@3225mhz -
    24. nick2crete - 6min 17sec 450ms - Core 2 Q6600 (2.4Ghz)@4057mhz - 001368
    25. Tsif - 6min 23sec 840ms - Core 2 Q6600 (2.4Ghz)@3816mhz - [email protected] - abit ip35pro - on AIR
    26. Vediovis - 6min 24sec 420ms - Core 2 Q6600 (2.4Ghz)@3852mhz -
    27. madg - 6min 50sec 190ms - Core 2 Q6600 (2.4Ghz)@36086mhz -
    28. DosTheBoss - 6min 53sec 200ms - Core 2 Q6600 (2.4Ghz)@36002mhz -
    29. pappous_soulis - 6min 59sec 340ms - Core 2 Q6600 (2.4Ghz)@3402mhz - Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3400Mhz on air
    30. eythigramisi - 7min 3sec 920ms - Core 2 Q6600 (2.4Ghz)@3400mhz - no description
    31. chris_oktabit - 7min 27sec 500ms - Phenom X4 [email protected] - no description
    32. ageorge2500 - 7min 28sec 300ms - Phenom X4 [email protected] - no description
    33. deadlock7 - 7min 36sec 640ms - Core 2 Q6600 (2.4Ghz)@3200mhz -
    34. junior-21- - 7min 48sec 570ms - Core 2 E8400 (3.0Ghz)@5218.90mhz - E8400 @ 5218,9Mhz
    35. Magnus - 8min 12sec 780ms - processor unknown -
    36. AN7 OverClocker - 8min 15sec 560ms - Core 2 E8500 (3.17Ghz)@5516mhz - C2D [email protected] 5516
    37. Pokemon640 - 8min 15sec 830ms - processor unknown - Default settings
    38. F117 - 8min 42sec 919ms - Core 2 E8400 (3.0Ghz)@5226mhz -
    39. CCC - 9min 4sec 20ms - Core 2 E8500 (3.17Ghz)@4775mhz - no description
    40. Spyrus - 9min 18sec 830ms - Core 2 E8400 (3.0Ghz)@4500mhz - [email protected]@Asus Maximus [email protected] Value 800 on [email protected]+Papst-Air
    41. ppaylos - 9min 19sec 300ms - processor unknown - no description
    42. Shadow Hunter - 9min 51sec 440ms - Core 2 E8400 (3.0Ghz)@4302.10mhz - no description
    43. kintaro - 9min 54sec 990ms - Core 2 E8500 (3.17Ghz)@4590mhz - no description
    44. dread77 - 10min 4sec 530ms - Core 2 Q6600 (2.4Ghz)@3780.20mhz - no description
    45. soki - 10min 33sec 840ms - Core 2 E8400 (3.0Ghz)@4545mhz - no description
    46. darkCount - 10min 46sec 550ms - Core 2 E6700 (2.66Ghz)@4269mhz - Core2Duo [email protected] on Frozen Armor SS
    47. didicola - 10min 48sec 830ms - Core 2 Q6600 (2.4Ghz)@3698mhz - no description
    48. TiN - 10min 49sec 430ms - Core 2 E6600 (2.4Ghz)@4418mhz - no description
    49. geoal - 10min 56sec 60ms - Core 2 E6600 (2.4Ghz)@4140.10mhz -
    50. Panansas - 11min 52sec 610ms - Core 2 E8400 (3.0Ghz)@4005mhz - no description

generated by hwbot - http://www.hwbot.org - [email protected]

Edited by RootX
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Παιδιά λύστε μου την απορία!

Δείτε το χρόνο που κάνει ο χρήστης richba5tard εδώ --> http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561317

και το χρόνο που κάνω εγώ εδώ --> http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653092

Και οι δύο χρόνοι έχουν γίνει με τον ίδιο επεξεργαστή με τη διαφορά ότι εγώ έχω τη δικιά μου CPU στα +772 MHz.

Είναι δυνατόν να συμβαίνει αυτό; Μήπως ανεβαίνουν και μη αξιόπιστα αποτελέσματα και μάλιστα βαθμολογούνται;

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Αρχική απάντηση από pusher

Παιδιά λύστε μου την απορία!

Δείτε το χρόνο που κάνει ο χρήστης richba5tard εδώ --> http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561317

και το χρόνο που κάνω εγώ εδώ --> http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653092

Και οι δύο χρόνοι έχουν γίνει με τον ίδιο επεξεργαστή με τη διαφορά ότι εγώ έχω τη δικιά μου CPU στα +772 MHz.

Είναι δυνατόν να συμβαίνει αυτό; Μήπως ανεβαίνουν και μη αξιόπιστα αποτελέσματα και μάλιστα βαθμολογούνται;

δεν ειναι αναγκη να καθεσαι να σπαζοκεφαλιαζεις γιατ το αν γινεται ή οχι. κανεις report για να το αμφισβητησεις στο hwbot και τελειωσες...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 3 months later...

Χεχε είμαι Nr2 παγκοσμίως μετά τον Kingpin :D

wprimeaw4.th.jpg

Και ναι, ο Task Manager υποτίθεται ότι έπρεπε να δείχνει το tab με τα 16 cores, αλλά με το Νούρη δίπλα μου να πεινάει και να με τραβάει από το μανίκι δεν το πρόσεξα...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

γμτ 340ms διαφορά... Δεν ήξερα και τι tweaks να κάνω.

2008 Datacenter έβαλα και είχα περιορισμένα προγράμματα που μπορούσα να τρέξω.

Έβαλα ένα Rightmark CPU Clock utility για να "κλείσω" το C1E αλλά δεν είχε τίποτα άλλο :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
:whip:Ανεβασα το παρακατω αποτελεσμα sto Hwbot και μου λεει οτι (no verification image or link found) τι πρεπει να κανω για να περασει? Δεν ειιναι και τρομερο νουμερο αλλα εχουμε μελλον!!!! :whip: Συνεχιζω .... βλεπω το ονομα μου τελικα στο ΗwΒΟΤ και εχω παρει 2.8 ποντους Αφου μου εγραφε πως δεν ειμαι στην 100αδα γιατι μου εδωσε ποντους? κι αλλη ερωτηση αμα κανω κι αλλο , ενα κλικ καλυτερο αποτελεσμα θα παρω κι αλλους ποντους? ελπιζω καποιος να μην βαριετε ν απαντηση !!! Η.Ο.Τ

post-911-1416073643,2653_thumb.jpg

Edited by ppaylos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.